|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
喜报 《中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)》 被中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)收录 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
期刊名称:中华消化病与影像杂志
(电子版)
主管单位:中华人民共和国国家 卫生健康委员会
主办单位:中华医学会
承办单位:山东省第二人民医院(山东省耳鼻喉医院)
总 编 辑: 王宝成 孙钢 中华消化病与影像杂志( 电子版)
编辑部
电 话:0531-83086377
15564155687编辑部微信号
邮政编码:250022
您是第 5489907位浏览者
|
您当前的位置:首页 >> 正文 |
[摘要]:目的 探讨胃食管阀瓣(GEFV)分级在伴有食管外症状的反流性食管炎(RE)中的分布特点及临床意义。方法 选择聊城市人民院、济南市中心医院消化科、呼吸科及耳鼻喉科门诊和住院,行胃镜检查确诊的554例RE患者,按照是否伴有食管外症状(反流性咽喉炎、反流性咳嗽、反流性哮喘)分为对照组与试验组。分析不同年龄段与GEFV异常检出率的关系、RE伴发食管外症状发生率的关系以及GEFV分级与RE伴发食管外症状发生率的关系。结果 年龄增长与异常GEFV的发生率、食管外症状的发生率呈正相关 (r =0.111,P = 0.01;r =0.129,P = 0.01)。食管裂孔疝发生率随着GEFV分级增加而增加,异常GEFV中食管外症状发生率高于正常GEFV (42.95% 比13.07% ); 试验组的异常GEFV 发生率高于对照组(56.30% 比20.46%,P = 0.04)。食管外症状发生率随着GEFV分级而增加,与GEFV分级呈正相关(χ2 = 6.502,P = 0.01; r = 0.286, P = 0.015 )。重度RE组伴有食管外症状高于轻度RE组(48.51% 比12.86% );食管外症状发生率与RE分级呈正相关(r = 0.291,P < 0.05)。结论 GEFV分级可作为预测反流性食管炎伴发食管外症状的风险指标,在临床诊治中有一定的预测价值。
[Abstract] Objective To explore the distribution characteristics and clinical significance of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) classification in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) with extraesophageal symptoms. Methods A total of 554 patients with RE who were diagnosed by endoscopy in Departments of Gastroenterology, Respiratory and Otolaryngology of Liaocheng People's Hospital and Jinan Central Hospital were selected. All patients were divided into control group and experimental group according to whether accompanied by extraesophageal symptoms (reflux laryngitis, reflux cough, reflux asthma). The relationships between different age groups and abnormal detection rate of GEFV and the incidence of RE with extraesophageal symptoms, and the relationship between GEFV classification and the incidence of RE with extraesophageal symptoms were analyzed. Results The increase of age was positively correlated with the incidences of abnormal GEFV and extraesophageal symptoms (r=0.111, P=0.01; r=0.129, P=0.01). The incidence of hiatal hernia increased with GEFV grade. The incidence of extraesophageal symptoms in abnormal GEFV group was significantly higher than that in normal GEFV group (42.95% vs. 13.07%). The incidence of abnormal GEFV in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (56.30% vs. 20.46%, P=0.04). The incidence of extraesophageal symptoms increased with GEFV classification and was positively correlated with GEFV classification (χ2=6.502, P=0.01; r=0.286, P=0.015). Extraesophageal symptoms in severe RE group were higher than those in mild RE group (48.51% vs. 12.86%). The incidence of extraesophageal symptoms was positively correlated with RE grade (r=0.291, P<0.05). Conclusion GEFV classification can be used as a risk index for predicting extraesophageal symptoms in reflux esophagitis, and has certain predictive value in clinical diagnosis and treatment.
地址:山东济南市槐荫区段兴西路4号,山东省第二人民医院《中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)》编辑部;
邮政编码:250022;电话:0531-83086377;投稿邮箱:zhxhbyyxzz@126.com 鲁公网安备 37010402001170号
本系统由北京博思汇文数字科技有限公司设计开发 技术服务电话:010-60213898