读者在线:用户名 密码
首页期刊简介投稿须知期刊目录专家风采编委会特约编委特邀顾问广告发行联系我们

喜报

《中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)》

被中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)收录




刊物信息more
期刊名称:中华消化病与影像杂志
              (电子版)
主管单位:中华人民共和国国家
           卫生健康委员会
主办单位:中华医学会
承办单位:山东省第二人民医院(山东省耳鼻喉医院)
总 编 辑: 王宝成   孙钢
 
网 址http://www.zhxhbyyxzz.com
地 址
济南市槐荫区段兴西路4号
        
  中华消化病与影像杂志( 电子版)
编辑部
电 话:0531-83086377
    

邮政编码:250022

电子邮箱:zhxhbyyxzz@126.com
国际标准刊号:ISSN 2095-2015
国内统一刊号:CN 11-9312/R
访问统计
您是第 5828472位浏览者
  您当前的位置:首页 >> 正文

硫酸镁钠钾口服液与复方聚乙二醇电解质散对患者肠道清洁的对比研究 [中文引用][英文引用]

Comparative study of oral solution of magnesium sodium potassium sulfate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder on intestinal cleansing in patients

作者(英文): 
单位(英文): 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2023·1·第4期(259-261)
DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2023.04.015
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 【摘要】目的 对比硫酸镁钠钾口服液与聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查中对肠道清洁的效果。方法:随机选取2022年1月1日至2023年1月1日亳州市人民医院住院需结肠镜检查的患者200例,按随机数字表法,分为观察组(硫酸镁钠钾口服液)和对照组(复方聚乙二醇电解质散),统计两组肠道准备成功率、全结肠及各部分肠段的波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)、患者满意度、患者愿意再次使用本药物的比例及安全性。结果:观察组与对照组在各结肠段BBPS评分:全结肠7.8±1.4 vs 7.4±1.3,右半结肠 2.6±0.5 vs 2.3±0.5,横结肠 2.7±0.5 vs 2.5±0.6,左半结肠 2.7±0.5 vs 2.3±0.6,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组肠道准备≥6分的占98%,对照组占91%(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组,观察组愿意再次选择此次肠道清洁剂患者高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:硫酸镁钠钾口服液在肠道准备效果中优于聚乙二醇电解质散,患者易于接受。

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 【Abstract】  Objective  To compare the efficacy of oral solution of magnesium sodium potassium sulfate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder on intestinal cleansing during colonoscopy. Methods  A total of 200 patients in Bozhou People's Hospital requiring colonoscopy from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 were selected. According to random number table method, all patients were randomly divided into observation group (oral solution of magnesium sodium potassium sulfate) and control group (polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder). The success rate of intestinal preparation, the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) of the whole colon and all parts of the intestine, patient satisfaction, the proportion of patients willing to re-use this drug and the safety of the two groups were analyzed respectively. Results  The BBPS scores of the whole colon and each segment of colon in the observation group and the control group showed 7.8±1.4 vs. 7.4±1.3 in the whole colon, 2.6±0.5 vs. 2.3±0.5 in the right colon, 2.7±0.5 vs. 2.5±0.6 in the transverse colon, 2.7±0.5 vs. 2.3±0.6 in the left colon, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). 98% of the observation group and 91% of the control group had intestinal preparation score ≥6 (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the patients in the observation group who were willing to choose the intestinal cleanser again were more than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion  The oral solution of magnesium sodium potassium sulfate is better than polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in the effects of intestinal preparation, which is easy to be accepted by patients.

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

欢迎阅读《中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)》!您是该文第 600 位读者!

若需在您的论文中引用此文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文著录格式: 孔绘敏1,王秀勤1,梁海2.硫酸镁钠钾口服液与复方聚乙二醇电解质散对患者肠道清洁的对比研究.中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版).2023;1(4):259-261.
英文著录格式: .Comparative study of oral solution of magnesium sodium potassium sulfate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder on intestinal cleansing in patients.No Title Settings.2023;1(4):259-261.

与该文相关的文章(仅限于本刊内

已投本刊未发表相似文章

地址:山东济南市槐荫区段兴西路4号,山东省第二人民医院《中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)》编辑部;

邮政编码:250022;电话:0531-83086377;投稿邮箱:zhxhbyyxzz@126.com  鲁公网安备 37010402001170号

本系统由北京博思汇文数字科技有限公司设计开发 技术服务电话:010-60213898

鲁ICP备18044012号-6